FIRE INSURANCE

Fire insurance began a few years after the Great Fire of London (1666) when a speculative builder Nicolas Barbon started the Fire Office in 1680. By 1805 there were 11 fire offices in London and over 30 in the British Isles. They ran their own fire brigades and issued fire marks to be affixed to the walls of building to mark them as being insured by particular company. Brigades sometimes refused to put out a fire on properties which were not insured, but sat around to be ready if the flames spread to properties bearing their fire marks. Later a good deal of co-operation developed and eventually the fire-brigades became part of the public service.

By the start of the twentieth century the need for household policies covering a wider range of risks began to be appreciated. By the 1920s policies covering not only fire but storm and tempest, burst pipes, impacts, explosions, and burglary were introduced. In more recent years aircraft damage, collapse of television aerials, and householders’ liabilities to the public have been added.

One feature of this type of insurance is the influence it has exerted over the years on public policy. The whole question of safety in buildings is continuously under review. Lower premiums are offered to firms and householders who take more sophisticated precautions such as installing sprinkler devices. Even the layout of towns and housing projects to leave adequate fire gaps and escapes on high building are affected by the activities of the insurance lobby, who have the public interest as well as their own interests at heart.

The chief types of policy issued by the fire offices are:

(a) Fire insurance on domestic and business premises, and their contents.

(b) Consequential Loss insurance. (This type of policy ensures that a firm continues to receive reasonable payments in lieu of profits while rebuilding is going on. Otherwise the business may lose all connection with its customers, and are be unable to pay fixed charges such as rates and mortgage repayments which still continue even when the premise have been destroyed.)

(c) Special perils. Many of these are now covered in the normal householder’s policies, but flooding is a special peril which is sometimes not covered by these policies. (For Malaysian readers kindly note that flooding is covered in our Houseowner's and Householder's policies. I will be going into further details regarding these policies in my future posting at this site.)

(d) Household policies. These have already been described above.

MARINE INSURANCE-LOSSES AT SEA

There may be total loss or partial loss:

(i) Total loss. If a ship is lost at sea , or if the cargo is completely destroyed , this is known as an actual total loss. If the cargo is so seriously damaged that it can no longer serve the purpose for which it was intended , or if the ship itself has to be abandoned , this is called a constructive total loss.

(ii) Partial loss. Frequently, however, a ship or its cargo may suffer only partial damage. In this connection the term average is used in marine insurance (and in fire insurance also ) to mean loss. Thus, there is general average and particular average.

General average occurs, for instance, if some of the cargo has to be jettisoned in order to secure the safety of the ship. In this case the loss is not borne only by the owners of cargo but also by the shipowners , since the loss was incurred in order to save the ship. Similarly, if the ship has damage and has to be towed into port the extra expense incurred in doing this will not fall entirely on the shipowners but also on the owners of the cargo, since it was in their interests too for the ship to be saved from total loss.

Particular average occurs when part of the cargo or the ship suffers damage, and where the partial loss is entirely borne by either the owners of the cargo or the shipowners , as the case might be. If, for example , the ship was in collision any damage would be the responsibility of the shipowners; on the other hand, if sea water, shipped while the vessel had struggling through heavy seas, should damage the cargo that would be the responsibility of the owners of the cargo. Thus, a policy taken out “with particular average” provides insurance against all risks at sea, but if it is “free of particular average, “ then cover is provided only against total loss and general average.

In the case of partial loss the extent of the damage has to be assessed by an independent official, know as an average adjuster. In order to secure international uniformity in the adjustment of general average, the York-Antwerp Rules were drawn up.

THE MAIN SECTIONS OF MARINE INSURANCE

The main sections of marine insurance are hull, cargo, freight, and shipowner’s liability.

(a) Hull. The hull of the vessel, which includes the machinery, can be covered against damage or total loss by storm, stranding, fire, collision, or other perils of the sea. Insurance begins from the laying of the keel, when the insurable interest lies with the shipbuilder. After passing into the hands of the buyer, the insurable interest lies with the shipowner from then on. Some policies are time policies, lasting usually for 12 months, or they may be voyage policies lasting from port of departure to port of arrival without a specific time being agreed.

(b) Cargo. The insurance of cargo is absolutely vital in the import and export trade, since the question of payment for the goods hinges around the existence of a reliable insurance policy. This will be explained in detail in my future posting, and the reader is urged to investigate this aspect of cargo insurance thoroughly. The main point is that the existence of an insurance policy in conjunction with a Bill of Lading means that whoever purchases the goods by purchasing the Bill of Lading also subrogates (inherits the rights to ) the insurance claim that may arise if the goods are lost at sea. He therefore buys with confidence, since his purchase is completely secure. Without the insurance policy no one would be prepared to pay for the goods until they had arrived safely.

Cargo policies refer to the movement of goods exported from or imported to a country. At some point the insurable interest will pass from the seller to the buyer, according to the contract of sale. Usually this will be either an F.O.B contract (Free on Board-the seller to deliver the goods on board the carrying vessel)or a C.I.F contract (Cost, Insurance, Freight- the seller to deliver the goods to the port of destination).

Cargo policies cover all risks including war and strike risks, and are based on the value placed on them by the seller-this means the ordinary invoice price. The holder usually has the right to claim, since, except in rare instances, the property in the cargo vests with the holder of the Bill of Lading , to which the policy and invoice are invoice are attached. It follows that for the whole of the time the marine policy is in effect the cargo is the property of the holder of the Bill of Lading.

Floating policies are a variation of cargo policies. They give cover for a specified sum, say $1 million, and eliminate the necessity of insuring each cargo separately. For instance a cross-Channel ferry would be greatly inconvenienced if underwriting insurance had to be negotiated for every trip. The master simply notifies the value of the cargo before sailing on each voyage, and this is set against the floating policy. As soon as the sums already covered approach the total value of the policy the premium will be renewed to extend the cover for a further period.

Open-cover agreements are sometimes made by which an underwriter agrees automatically to cover any consignment notified to him up to a certain limit at a pre-arranged rate for a particular voyage. Policies are issued after shipments are notified.

(c) Freight. The word ‘freight’ is often used as a synonym for cargo, but it has a different meaning in insurance. Here the word means the charge for carrying cargo. A shipowner often gets the freight in advance, but since he is not legally entitled to it until the cargo is safely delivered, he may face an action for recovery of the freight should the cargo be lost overboard. If it is not recoverable because of a special clause in the contract of carriage it will form part of the insured value of the cargo. If it is payable on delivery, it will be a matter for the shipowner to insure against loss of freight. It follows that in nearly every case there is some party with an insurable interest in the freight. Underwriters are prepared to cover this risk of loss of freight, just as in fire insurance they are prepared to cover not only the risk of a fire itself, but the risk of loss of profits while a building is out of use after the fire. Since ‘freight’ is the reward for carrying, it is the income of the carrier.

(d) Shipowners’ liabilities. These are very numerous: not only cargo, passengers, and crew but other vessels, fixed installations such as piers and wharves, and even beaches are liable to be damaged by the actions of ships and ships’ masters. After the Torrey Canyon disaster near Land’s End, a bond of 3 million pounds was required from the owners to cover claims for detergent used, and loss of business suffered by the authorities and businessmen involved in clearing the beaches of oil from the tanker. These eventualities represent a further heavy burden placed upon shipowners. Insurance relives them of these risks, and enables them more confidently to go about their business on the high seas.

MARINE INSURANCE

Ever since 1575, when a Chamber of Assurance was set up in the Royal Exchange of the City of London, there has been a recognized centre for the registration of marine–insurance policies. Registration is evidence of the terms of the contract and is helpful in settling disputes. The 1601 Act already referred to set up a Court of Arbitration to settle disputes over policies.

The insurance of ships and their cargoes is perhaps the oldest form of insurance , for there is evidence that it existed some 2000 years ago. Marine insurance, as this branch of insurance is called, is undertaken by underwriters who are members of Lloyd’s and by marine-insurance companies. Lloyd’s underwriters are the most widely known and the most important insurers in the world. They undertake all kinds of insurance business, but they are best known for marine insurance. Lloyd’s itself does not do insurance business; this is undertaken by its members, either as individuals or working in small syndicates. Lloyd’s as an institution dates from the eighteenth century, when business was transacted in a coffee-house run by Edward Lloyd which was much frequented by merchants engaged in foreign trade. In those days coffee-house were more in the nature of clubs, some being the resort of men of learning and others of businessmen. Today Lloyd’s has its own large premise.

The members of Lloyd’s are underwriters, so called because of the custom of writing their names under any risk a portion of which they were prepared to cover. At the same time they indicated the amount of risk they were prepared to undertake. If a cargo worth $80,000 is to be insured one underwriter may be willing to cover (say) $4000, and if so he will attach his name to group amount. Another underwriter or a syndicate (that is, a small group working together) may choose to cover $6000. The broker who acts between the shipper and the underwriters will go from one to another until the full $80.000 has been covered. In this way the risk is spread over a number of members. A marine insurance company generally covers an entire risk itself.

THE TYPES OF INSURANCE

The four main branches of insurance are:

(a) Marine Insurance


(b) Fire Insurance


(c) Life Insurance


(d) Accident Insurance

There is no real difference between the words 'insurance' and 'assurance', but in Britain it has become customary to use the word assurance when referring to life policies. The events being insured in life assurance will assuredly happen-for we all die, whereas in all other insurances we do not necessarily ever suffer a loss. This seems to be the reason for the word 'assured' in connection with life policies.

THE SCOPE OF INSURANCE

There are many business risks which can be insured against. A shopkeeper will usually also want to insure his shop window, if it is a large one, and companies exist which specialize in this branch of insurance. Merchants and manufacturers responsible for the dispatch, by railway, road, sea or air, of large consignments of goods will insure them against damage or loss while they are in transit. If the railway carries goods at “company’s risk”- the charge for which is higher than if the goods are sent at “owner’s risk”- this means that the railway itself is accepting responsibility for the goods arriving at their destination undamaged. Letters and parcels can be sent by registered post, and in this case it is the Post Office which takes responsibility for their safe arrival. In these last two instances the railway and the Post Office respectively are really acting as insurers.

Insurance against fire dates back more than a thousand years. The first company in England to undertake fire insurance was established in London in 1680. It is interesting to note that the early insurance companies operated their own fire brigades in order to try to reduce the damage for which they would have to pay compensation.

To receive compensation in the case of fire only to the value of the premises and goods which have been destroyed may not fully indemnify a trader for his loss. As a result of the fire he may be put out of business until he has acquired new premises and stock. To cover such contingencies, it is possible to insure against loss of profit as a result of fire. Those who own motor vehicles –ships and aircraft can insure them against damage or loss. In the case of motor vehicles the law compels the owner to insure against what is called ”third-party” claims. A third party is any person, other than the insurance company and the insured, who is involved in an accident. For example, a pedestrian who has been knocked down by a motor car might put in a claim against the driver for compensation for injury. In this case the pedestrian is the third party.

Under the Employers’ Liability and Workmen’s Compensation Acts an employee could bring a claim for compensation against his employer if he had suffered injury at work. If the injury was serious a court of law might award compensation to the extent of thousands of dollars. This, however, is now part of the Socso Scheme, but employers can take out insurance policies to cover themselves against at common law which might be brought by an employee who suffers injury while at work and can prove the accident was due to the employer’s negligence. An individual, too, can insure himself against accidents. Many people used to insure themselves before taking a journey by train, and many still do so when they are travelling by air.

Where employees have to handle large sums of money belonging to their employers there is always the risk of loss to the employer if an employee turns dishonest. This risk, too, can be insured against, and is know as Fidelity Guarantee insurance.

Another branch of insurance which is very useful to business is cover against bad debts. All firms sell goods on credit have to face the possibility that some of their customers will not pay what they owe. This is a relatively new from of insurance, although several attempts have been made in the past to provide this kind of cover for businessmen. It was not until the insured was asked to bear a portion of the risk himself that successful schemes were worked out and operated. It is now an expanding branch of insurance provided by the overseas insurance companies. In order to encourage the export trade, many United States import and export companies has taken insurance against the non-payment of debts by foreign import merchants. British exporters can insure against bad debts of this kind through the Exports Credit Department of the Board of Trade, which has opened offices for this purpose in a number of important cities in Great Britain as well as in London. The business is conducted in very much the same way as that of an insurance company, the exporter paying a premium according to the risk involved.

The terms of each item of insurance are set out in a policy, and it is very important, therefore, that the insured should read this carefully, as sometimes there are exceptional circumstances to which the insurance will not apply and of which the insured should be aware.

Some insurance companies undertake all kinds of insurance, although some specialize in life assurance and others in general insurance.

The volume of insurance business has increased enormously during the past fifty years or so the total assets of insurance companies during that period have increased by ten times and their premium income by twenty times.

There are many other risks besides those mentioned above which can be insured against. A society holding an outdoor function and having to incur heavy expenses in its preparation can insure against rain on the day of the event. The organisers of agricultural shows and athletic meetings often cover themselves against possible loss in this way. In the United States it is compulsory for banks to insure their deposits up to a certain amount. This is a very valuable safeguard for small investors, who suffered heavy losses from the many American bank failures of the 1930s. If you wish, you can even insure your holiday against rain!

PAYING OUT THE JUST CLAIMS

If an insured person suffers a loss as a result of the peril against which he has insured he is entitled to be indemnified for the loss. The correct procedure is to make a claim on an appropriate claim form. This form must as usual be completed with the utmost good faith, and will then be considered by the insurance company. The following points will enter into their considerations:

(a) Was the insured peril the proximate cause of the loss? If so liability exists; if not the claim does not justify payment from the pool of an indemnity sum.

(b) Even if the claim appears at first sight to be justified, are there any breaches of the conditions of the policy? For instance in a motor-accident policy there is usually a clause that the vehicle must be regularly serviced, the tyres must be in good condition, etc. If I wreck my vehicle after skidding owing to the bad state of the tyres my claim will probably fail.

(c) If the claim is justified, what is the correct amount which will indemnify the applicant? Many claimants do not understand indemnity and ask for the replacement price of the goods destroyed. We have already seen that the true indemnity figures takes account of depreciation and may be considerably less than the replacement price.

When a ‘fair’ valuation has been agreed the insurance company pays the agreed sum. If this is large they may find it necessary to borrow from their bankers or even to sell some of their investments in order to realize the money to pay the claim. When the liner Andrea Doria sank, British insurance firms paid 4 million pounds within a few days

THE INSURANCE COMPANIES AS INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS

A slight diversion here is well worth while to take a quick look at the importance of the insurance companies as institutional investors. Investors are people who save part of their incomes and lend the savings to firms who are in need of capital. The money invested is used by the firms, either in primary, secondary, or tertiary production. It is converted into fixed assets of every kind, which are then used to produce more and more consumer goods. In short this is the capitalist system of production. Whether you live in a Communist, Socialist, or Capitalist society the use of the invested funds is the same. The difference between these systems is purely one ownership.

An institutional investor is an organization which collects savings from people and invests the savings in the same way as the private investor. The banks are an obvious example of institutional investors, but it is probably true to say that the insurance companies are at least equal in importance to the banks. This is particularly so today, because a change in the distribution of wealth since the Second World War has put more and more wealth into the hands of the poorer sections of our population. Heavy taxation of the rich has reduced the share of investment they are able to make, yet it has not put vast fortunes at the disposal of the poor. The increase in wealth has been so distributed that it has meant only a small increase for each family, and much of the increase is in better pension schemes, welfare facilities, etc. In other words personal and social insurance has played a large part in the increased standard of living of the mass of the people. The industrial life societies, with their countrywide network of agents, have been entrusted by many ordinary people with the small savings they can now afford, in the form of insurance and assurance policies. This represents a very valuable contribution to the capital requirements of industrialists, transport and shipping firms, farmers, forestry and other extractive industries, and wholesale and retail traders. It may fairly be said that through the medium of the insurance companies we have become a property-owning democracy.

By taking care of the ‘pool’ , investing it wisely in a balanced portfolio, keeping away from the involvement in the industries and concentrating on safe investments yielding a reasonable return the insurance companies have increased the reserves available to the insured members of the general public in times of distress or natural disaster.

TAKING CARE OF THE 'POOL'

The pool of resources from which compensation is to be paid must be large enough to meet all possible eventualities, and the insurance companies therefore maintain adequate 'catastrophe reserves'. These reserves are invested as carefully as possible.

A high proportion of this reserves is for life-assurance cover, which will be paid out to widows and orphans when death occurs. The rest is for general insurance activities, fire, marine, and accident policies. Clearly the skill of the investors in the service of the insurance companies is of the utmost importance to the policy holders and the shareholders of the companies.

FIXING THE PREMIUM

On the basis of the answers given to the questions in the proposal form the underwriters will decide a fair premium for the policy that the proposer wishes to take out. It should be noted that one part of the proposal form is a declaration signed by the proposer to the effect that he warrants the truth of the statements made. This warranty reinforces his common-law duty to show the utmost good faith with a contractual duty to have told the truth in every particular. This contractual duty is even more strict than the common-law duty, since any inaccuracy makes the contract voidable, whether or not it relates to a material fact. A material fact is defined as one which will influence an underwriter in entering into, or fixing the premium for, a contract of insurance. This declaration is the basis of the contract of insurance. It is incorporated in the offer of the Insurance Company to insure the proposer for a certain sum of money called a premium. The person desiring insurance can accept this offer by paying the premium, whereupon commences, and a policy will be issued giving a full account of what has been agreed.

INSURABLE AND NON INSURABLE RISKS

Not all risks are insurable. Insurance depends upon the calculation of probabilities. The probability that an event will occur is estimated by the underwriter. In Life Assurance statisticians called actuaries are experts in the statistical analysis of probabilities in the mortality, sickness and retirement fields. Statistical records over a very long period enable them to calculate the chances of any particular applicant, say a bus driver, suffering from a disability, or dying before the policy matures. The premium is then fixed at such a figure that the insurance company will be able to meet the obligations it has assumed.

Some risks are not susceptible to insurance, because there are no records on which to make calculations. I cannot insure against the risk that I shall prove to be a fool in business, for there are no records of my success or failure to help the actuaries.

All the questions in the proposal form shown below affect the calculations of the probability of someone being hurt. For instance in Question 3:

(a) The date of the event. Some days are busier than others. A public entertainment on Tuesday will not attract many people, for they will be at work. A public entertainment on Saturday and Sunday will attract a large crowd, with consequently greater chances that someone will be hurt.

(b) Number of days involved. If it goes on for only one day the risks will be smaller than of it to run over a complete week.

(c) Full particulars of the event. If it is a ‘Dogs Show‘ the risks will be less than if it is a sports-car meeting or an air-display. The actuaries need to know what type of event is being staged before they can fix the premium.

(d) The anticipated attendance. It will make a great deal of difference to the chances of someone being hurt if the attendance is large. Not only will the numbers available to be hurt be greater, but the chances of collisions will be greater too. This applies especially in car parks, or on terraced stands.

Under the heading of insurable risks come such risks as fire, burglary, storm and tempest, marine disasters, and motor vehicle and aviation accidents. Non-insurable risks include such item as the chances that the goods a businessman has bought will cease to be fashionable before he has sold them, or the chances that a slump will develop so that his business proves unprofitable.

A SAMPLE OF THE PROPOSAL FORM

PROPOSAL FORM
for
PUBLIC ENTERTAINMENTS,
CONCERT AND SIMILAR EVENTS



THE INSURANCE ACT: You are to disclose ion the proposal form fully and faithfully all the facts you know or ought to know otherwise the policy issued hereunder may be void.



1. Name of Persons, Committee or Authority in whose favour insurance is
required..............................................................................................................

2.Address............................................................................................................

3.(a)Date of event.....................................................................................
(b) Number of days involved (allow for setting up and dismantling).........
(c) Full particulars of the event including where it is to be held.................
(d) Anticipated attendance....................................................

4. Are any grandstands or street decorations to be erected?......................
If so-(a) Will these be approved by the Local Authority?............................
(b) What will be the capacity of the grandstands?........................................
(c) By whom will they be erected?..................................................................

5. Is there to be a car park?.............................................................................
If so-(a) What will be maximum capacity?.....................................................
(b) Will any charge be made?..................................................................
(c) Will tickets be issued?........................................................................
(If so please attach a specimen)
(d) Will any notices be displayed disclaiming liability?.......................
(If so please attach wording)

6. Will adequate precautions be taken to protect the public from any dart
throwing, rifle shooting or similar side shows?...............................................

7. Is there to be a display of fireworks?...............................................................
If so-(a) Will this be operated by independent contractors?.........................
(b) What precautions to avoid injury will be taken?.............................

8. Please state-
(a) Limit of Indemnity required.............................................................
(b) Whether insurance is required against liability arising out of:
(i) Damage to property by fire and explosion.................................
(ii) Personal injury caused by fireworks..........................................
(iii) Car park for which a charge is made..........................................



Declaration:

I agree that this proposal shall form the basis of the contract between me and ABC Insurance Company and I am willing to accept a policy subject to the terms prescribed by the company therein and to pay the premium thereon.




Date..........................................


Signature of Proposer............................................

HOW AN INSURANCE POLICY IS BROUGHT INTO EFFECT

The first thing to do when we wish to insure against any risk is to state clearly what the risk is, and to provide information which will enable the insurance company to assess the probability of the risk occurring. This is most easily done by filing up a standard Proposal Form which will be supplied by the company; if the risk is of a very unusual nature such a standard form may use together with other questionnaires. The top posting in this site shows a typical proposal form; in this case for liability to members of the public who may suffer an accident of some sort at a funfair or outdoor concert, etc.

A PAGE TO TEST YOU ON THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF INSURANCE

THIS POST TO BE PUBLISH SOON!!!!

BASIS PRINCIPLE OF INSURANCE

Let us recapitulate the basic Principles of Insurance. The basic principles are:

1. A person who insures a motor vehicle must have an insurable interest in it.

2. The sums contributed to an insurance pool are called premiums.

3. Payment for losses suffered is called compensation.

4. Insurance contracts must be made with both parties showing the utmost good faith.

5. To restore a person to his original position before he suffered a loss is to idemnify him.

6. The sum payable on a life policy is called the benefit.

7. An insurance company which pays out a claim then subrogates the rights of the insured party.

8. If two policies cover the same loss each company will contribute towards it.

9. Public policy is aimed at reducing or preventing crimes.

10. By means of which policies of insurance the loss lighteth rather easily upon many than heavily upon few.

THE DOCTRINE OF PROXIMATE CAUSE

This rule says that if we insure against a certain eventuality we are entitled to compensation only if that eventuality is the immediate (or proximate) cause of the loss. If the immediate cause is some other peril, which has been especially excepted by the insurance policy, then no claim arises. For instance, if I insure my house against fire and a petrol tanker runs into it and cause a blaze, the chain of events to a fire (an insured peril) and I may claim. Suppose the policy excludes fires cause by road accidents-because the house is situated at the bottom of a hill on the way to an oil refinery. The excepted peril is clearly the proximate cause of the loss, fire following naturally as a consequence of the accident, and no claim arises.

I will go into further details on this subject 'proximate cause' in the future posting in this site.

THE SECOND COROLLARY OF INDEMNITY-SUBROGATION

If the principle of indemnity says that I must be restored to the condition I was before I suffered the loss, it would be wrong for me to accept an agreed sum in compensation and then continue to have any other rights as well. A few examples will illustrate this

Example 1. My car is wrecked in an accident. I agree to accept RM40,000 in settlement of my claim. The wreck is worth RM3,500 when sold to the workshop for use as spare parts. If I received this RM3,500 as well as the RM40,000 I would be getting more than the true indemnity for my loss. The insurance company therefore steps into my shoes as owner of the wreck, and the RM3,500 returns to the pool. The word ‘subrogate’ means ‘to step into the place of’, or ‘to find a substitute for’. One could say that when they pay out the claim the insurance company inherits all the rights of the person accepting settlement of the claims. This means that they also inherit the right to sue other parties in the accident for any share of the loss which their negligence may have caused.

Example 2. A celebrated American racehorse which had won many classic races broke his leg on a Californian track. The owner had insured the horse for $250,000 with a British insurance firm, who had take the precaution of sending a representative to the track. The owner was about to give the veterinary surgeon permission to destroy the animal when the insurance representative declared his interest. He would not permit the animal to be destroyed, and soon the rare sight of a horse with a leg in plaster could be seen in the stables where the insurance company were trying to cure the animal. They paid out the claim for the racehorse and although he never raced again he was put to stud and had many fine descendants. The insurance company eventually recovered from breeding fees more than the sum paid out, and restored to the ‘pool’ all its losses. Subrogation had taken place in the nick of time to prevent the destruction of the animal.

THE FIRST COROLLARY OF INDEMNITY-CONTRIBUTION

Suppose I insure my goods against fire for RM100,00 and suffer a loss by fire of the insured goods for that amount. I shall be indemnified for the loss and receive RM100,000 out of the pool. Suppose I insure against the loss with two or three companies, would it be fair for me to claim from each company the sum of RM100,000? Clearly it would not, for I would be restored to a better position that I was in before. This would be against public policy, for it might encourage me to cause the loss to happen, so that my condition improves.

Such double insurance is unlikely today, and the insured might even be suspected of fraudulent intent. A more usual case would be where two policies overlapped, as for example where a burglary policy and an all-risks policy exist covering the same goods. The companies concerned will contribute to the loss proportionately, the exact division depending upon the terms of the original policies. To discover whether they should pay in full, or only contribute, every claim form asks the insured ‘Is any other company interested in the goods which are the subject of this claim?’ An honest answer to this question lets the insurance company know their true position.

THE PRINCIPLE OF INDEMNITY AND LIFE ASSURANCE

The principle of indemnity cannot apply in a straightforward way to life assurance, for no sum of money can equate the loss of life. Similarly in personal accident cases the loss of a limb cannot be measured accurately in terms of money. All that these policies can do is to provide a sum of money, called the benefit payment, as compensation.

Even so the principle does have some influence. Life assurance premiums are roughly related to the way life of the person concerned, for he must be able to afford the premiums, and weekly benefits for loss of earnings after an accident are not allowed to exceed the normal, earnings of the insured.

LATEST NEWS!!!

Today is 01/01/2008, and it marks a very significant day in my life and the beginning of a new year for me as I had already a made a very important decision by resigning from my job with the insurance company I am attached to for more than 12 years. Today also marks the 'soft' launch of my insurance site tor the general public after months of preparation. From today onwards I will be spending more time on this site to provide and help the agents and insuring public by providing them with the necessary information and knowledge on insurance.

As the insurance industry is changing rapidly from time to time, consumers; insurance agents and the general public needs more informative articles and guidelines to be able to make an informed decision in insurance buying and selling respectively.

With the above topics in mind, and with the advancement of the internet tool as a form to share ideas; information and knowledge, I decided to share my experience in the insurance industry by starting this insurance site whereby everybody can access to all the facts you need to know about insurance. In this insurance site, readers will find an extensive information on various aspect of insurance and I strive to provide only quality articles, so if there is a specify topic relating to insurance that readers would like me to cover, please feel free to contact me anytime at my e-mail address at insuranceblog4u@gmail.com or you can always drop in a comment at this site.

Thank you to those readers who contribute daily to my insurance site.